Preliminary Analysis of FY2020 LSC Funding | $135M Increase Proposed
- Jun 10, 2019
- 1 min read
On May 16, 2019, the House of Representatives Subcommittee that allocates funding to Legal Services Corporation (LSC) released the draft text of a bill, found here, that would increase LSC's funding by $135 million. This is a preliminary analysis, prepared by OneJustice, of the proposed allocation.
Analysis: On pages 85-86 of the House's bill, LSC's total funding would increase by 33%, from $415 million to $550 million. All but $7 million of the $135 million increase would go to basic field grants. Currently, California receives about 11.5% of all basic field funding–even after LSC lowered California's share of national funding earlier this year by 5.5%. If LSC's total funding for basic field grants were to increase by $128 million, then California stands to receive $14.5 million more in FY 2020. Total basic field funding for California, therefore, would increase from about $44 million to about $58.5 million. Please note that, in the table below, $5 million seems to be unaccounted for in the subcommittee's bill.
In response, the National Legal Aid and Defender Association ("NLADA") suggested that the Republican-led Senate is likely to propose a lower funding level for LSC. The House and Senate might then arrive somewhere between LSC's current $415 million and the House subcommittee's proposed $550 million. NLADA also noted that the House subcommittee's total budget authority increased by only 15%, yet that subcommittee increased LSC's funding by about 33%. This demonstrates that everyday people's genuine access to our nation's legal system has become more important to our lawmakers.
Update provided to LSFN by Christopher McConkey, Senior Staff Attorney | OneJustice
I learned the hard way that fixing unauthorized charges with your bank doesn’t always fix what shows up on your consumer reports later. The money was refunded quickly, but the account activity still sat on my file and caused confusion when I applied for credit afterward. This article explains how unauthorized charges can turn into longer-term reporting issues and why they sometimes keep resurfacing even after the bank closes the case: https://consumerattorneys.com/blog/unauthorized-charges. It helped me understand why the reporting side needs just as much attention as the fraud claim itself.